Connect with us

Technologies

OpenAI trial: Nadella says Musk never raised concerns to him about Microsoft investment

Elon Musk named Microsoft as a defendant in his lawsuit against OpenAI

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella took the stand in the Musk v. Altman trial on Monday, where he testified that Elon Musk never contacted him with concerns that Microsoft’s investments in OpenAI were in violation of any special terms or commitments.
Nadella, wearing a navy suit with a blue tie, concluded his testimony in federal court in Oakland, California, after several hours of questioning. He answered questions about the early days of Microsoft’s strategic partnership with OpenAI, his understanding of the companies’ relationship and his role during the chaotic few days when Sam Altman was briefly ousted as CEO of OpenAI.
Altman’s testimony is slated to begin on Tuesday, according to his lawyers.
In 2024, Musk sued OpenAI, Altman, and the company’s president, Greg Brockman, alleging that they went back on their vow to protect the artificial intelligence company’s nonprofit structure and follow its charitable mission. Microsoft is named as a defendant in the lawsuit, as Musk accuses the company of aiding and abetting OpenAI’s purported breach of charitable trust.
Microsoft has been one of OpenAI’s major backers since 2019, years before the company rocketed into the mainstream with the launch of its ChatGPT chatbot in late 2022. Microsoft’s more than $13 billion worth of investments in OpenAI, including a $1 billion investment in 2019, a $2 billion investment in 2021 and $10 billion in 2023, have come up repeatedly over the course of the trial.
Nadella said he was “very proud” that Microsoft took the risk to invest in OpenAI when “no one else was willing” to bet on the fledgling lab.
Musk, who testified late last month, said Microsoft’s $10 billion investment was the key tipping point that made him believe OpenAI was violating its nonprofit mission. He testified that the scale of the investment bothered him, and it prompted him to open a legal investigation into OpenAI.
“I was concerned they were really trying to steal the charity,” Musk said from the stand.
Nadella said he did not believe Microsoft’s investments in OpenAI were donations, and that there was a clear commercial element to their partnership from the outset.
He said during the partnership’s early years, Microsoft gave OpenAI sharp discounts on computing resources, and Microsoft believed it would reap marketing benefits from doing so.
During a separate video deposition that was played on Monday morning, Michael Wetter, a corporate development executive at Microsoft, said the company has recognized approximately $9.5 billion in revenue to date through its partnership with OpenAI as of March 2025.
Musk co-founded OpenAI alongside Altman, Brockman and a handful of other executives and researchers in 2015. After a number of disagreements about OpenAI’s direction, including a failed effort to join it with his automaker Tesla, Musk left the OpenAI board in 2018. He went on to launch a competing AI startup, xAI, which he merged with SpaceX earlier this year.
OpenAI established a for-profit subsidiary in the months following Musk’s departure, which allowed the company to raise outside funding more easily. Investors, including Microsoft, have since poured billions of dollars into OpenAI’s for-profit arm, and the company’s valuation has swelled to more than $850 billion.
In November 2023, Altman was briefly fired from his role at OpenAI after the board determined he had not been “not consistently candid in his communications.” He was reinstated days later, after an intense few days of negotiations.
Nadella said he was “pretty surprised” by the board’s decision, and that his priority was to try and figure out how to maintain continuity for Microsoft customers. Immediately after Altman was removed, Nadella said he made an effort to learn more about what happened, adding that he suspected jealousy and poor communication was at play.
During conversations with OpenAI board members after the firing, Nadella said he was simply trying to understand the language in the OpenAI’s statement about Altman being “not consistently candid” while communicating with the board.
That language, Nadella said, “just didn’t sort of suffice, because this is the CEO of a company that we are invested in and we’re deeply partnered with, and so I felt that they could have explained to me what are the incidents or what is the detail behind it.”
There must have been instances of jealousy or miscommunication that could have justified pushing out Altman, Nadella said. He wanted more depth from the board members after the remark about candor, but no such information was available, he said.
“It was sort of amateur city, as far as I’m concerned,” Nadella testified.
In October, OpenAI completed a recapitalization that cemented its structure as a nonprofit with an equity stake in its for-profit business. As part of that announcement, Microsoft disclosed that it held a roughly 27% stake in OpenAI’s for-profit unit that was valued at around $135 billion.
The relationship between OpenAI and Microsoft has shown signs of strain in recent months, even as both companies continue to tout it as strategic and core to their businesses. Late last month, the same day that jury selection kicked off in Musk v. Altman, the companies announced a revamped partnership agreement that allows OpenAI to cap revenue share payments and serve customers across any cloud provider.
OpenAI said in a release that the agreement aimed to “simplify our partnership and the way we work together.”
Musk testified that he is not entirely against OpenAI having a for-profit unit, but he said it became “the tail wagging the dog.” He repeatedly accused Altman and Brockman of enriching themselves from a charity while also reaping the positive associations that come from running a nonprofit.
“Microsoft has their own motivations, and that would be different from the motivations of the charity,” Musk said from the stand. “All due respect to Microsoft, do you really want Microsoft controlling digital superintelligence?”
During a videotaped deposition shown in court last week, former OpenAI director Tasha McCauley recalled a discussion with Nadella and her fellow board members after the 2023 decision to dismiss Altman as OpenAI’s CEO.
“To the best of my recollection, Satya wanted to restore things to as they had been,” McCauley said. The board members didn’t think that was the right move, she said.
But as a court witness on Monday, Nadella said he never demanded that the board reinstate Altman as OpenAI CEO.
Musk lawyer Steven Molo showed Nadella screenshots of text messages Nadella had exchanged with Kevin Scott, Microsoft’s technology chief, about potential candidates to join OpenAI’s board.
Among those named in the conversation were Coinbase Chief Operating Officer Emilie Choi, former Eventbrite CEO Julia Hartz, former Gates Foundation CEO Sue Desmond-Hellmann, former Klein Perkins Caufield & Byers investor Bing Gordon, former Xerox CEO Ursula Burns, former LinkedIn CEO Jeff Weiner and former Alphabet director Diane Greene.
In 2015, Google bought Greene’s company Bebop, and she took over Google’s cloud division. In 2019, she left Google and the Alphabet board.
Nadella said “no” in a text message regarding Greene taking an OpenAI board seat. On Monday, he said that he was opposed because Greene, at the time, was affiliated with Google or had been until recently.
“I thought there were going to be conflicts because of our major competition with Google,” he said.
Nadella said that when he became Microsoft’s CEO in 2014, Google had been its main competitor in AI, following the search advertising company’s acquisition of AI lab DeepMind.
OpenAI announced the appointment of Desmond-Hellmann to its board in March 2024.
“I had known her from the past,” Nadella said.
Molo also asked about an email Nadella had sent in 2022 to Microsoft executives regarding terms that would be favorable when collaborating with OpenAI.
“I don’t want to be IBM and OpenAI to be Microsoft,” Nadella wrote.
In 1980, IBM signed a non-exclusive agreement to distribute Microsoft’s DOS operating system on IBM personal computers. The deal allowed Microsoft to do business around DOS with several other PC makers, leading the software to become pervasive. Later, Microsoft sold licenses of its Windows operating system to device makers, cementing its role in information technology.
“Eventually Microsoft grew to be a much more prominent and important company than IBM, correct?” Molo asked.
“That’s right,” Nadella said.
As of market close on Monday, Microsoft’s market capitalization stood at $3 trillion, while IBM was worth $210 billion.
OpenAI co-founder Sutskever takes the stand
After Nadella concluded his testimony, Ilya Sutskever, a former OpenAI co-founder and a renowned AI researcher, was called to the stand. Sutskever was wearing a blue button-down shirt, and he answered questions about his decision to join the company, his communications with Musk and his involvement in Altman’s ouster.
Sutskever used to work at Google, and he testified that the company offered to pay him as much as $6 million a year to try and keep him from leaving for OpenAI. He was one of the employees who eventually expressed concerns about Altman’s behavior to the board, in part because he said he felt “a great deal of ownership” over the startup.
“I simply cared for it, and I didn’t want it to be destroyed,” Sutskever said.
Bret Taylor, chairman of the board at OpenAI, followed Sutskever on the stand. He explained OpenAI’s structure to the jury, and he also spoke about the “dire” period when Altman was removed as chief executive.
Taylor did not finish his testimony before proceedings concluded on Monday, so he will be back on the stand on Tuesday at 8:30 a.m. PT.
— CNBC’s Lora Kolodny contributed to this report.
WATCH: The Musk vs. OpenAI trial is underway — here’s where things stand

Technologies

Waymo recalls 3,800 robotaxis after glitch allowed some vehicles to ‘drive into standing water’

Waymo issued a voluntary recall of about 3,800 of its robotaxis to fix software issues that could allow them to drive into flooded roadways.

Waymo is recalling about 3,800 robotaxis in the U.S. to fix software issues that could allow them to “drive onto a flooded roadway,” according to a letter on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s website.
The voluntary recall is for Waymo vehicles that use the company’s fifth and sixth generation automated driving systems (or ADS), the U.S. auto safety regulator said in the letter posted Tuesday.
Waymo autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas, were seen on camera driving onto a flooded street and stalling, requiring other drivers to navigate around them. It’s the latest example of a safety-related issue for the Alphabet-owned AV unit that’s rapidly bolstering its fleet of vehicles and entering new U.S. markets.
Waymo has drawn criticism for its vehicles failing to yield to school buses in Austin, and for the performance of its vehicles during widespread power outages in San Francisco in December, when robotaxis halted in traffic, causing gridlock.
The company said in a statement on Tuesday that it’s “identified an area of improvement regarding untraversable flooded lanes specific to higher-speed roadways,” and opted to file a “voluntary software recall” with the NHTSA.
“Waymo provides over half a million trips every week in some of the most challenging driving environments across the U.S., and safety is our primary priority,” the company said.
Waymo added that it’s working on “additional software safeguards” and has put “mitigations” in place, limiting where its robotaxis operate during extreme weather, so that they avoid “areas where flash flooding might occur” in periods of intense rain.
WATCH: Waymo launches new autonomous system in Chinese-made vehicle

Continue Reading

Technologies

Qualcomm tumbles 13% as semiconductor stocks retreat from historic AI-fueled surge

Semiconductor equities reversed sharply after a broad AI-driven advance, with Qualcomm suffering its worst day since 2020 amid inflation concerns and rising oil prices.

Semiconductor stocks fell sharply on Tuesday, reversing course after an extensive rally that had expanded the artificial intelligence investment theme well past Nvidia and driven the industry to unprecedented levels.

Qualcomm plunged 13% and was on track for its steepest single-day decline since 2020. Intel shed 8%, while On Semiconductor and Skyworks Solutions each lost more than 6%. The iShares Semiconductor ETF, which benchmarks the overall sector, fell 5%.

The sell-off came after a key gauge of consumer prices came in above forecasts, and as conflict in Iran pushed crude oil higher—prompting investors to shift away from riskier assets.

The preceding advance had widened the AI opportunity set beyond longtime industry leader Nvidia, which for much of the past several years had largely carried the market to new peaks on its own.

Explosive appetite for central processing units, along with the graphics processing units that power large language models, has sent chipmakers to all-time highs.

Market participants are wagering that the shift from AI model training to autonomous agents will lift demand for additional AI hardware. Among the beneficiaries are memory chip producers, which are raising prices as supply remains tight.

Micron Technology slid 6%, and Sandisk cratered 8%. Sandisk’s stock has surged more than six times over since January.

Continue Reading

Technologies

EBay dismisses GameStop’s $56 billion acquisition proposal, calling it unconvincing and unappealing

EBay has rejected GameStop’s $56 billion unsolicited buyout bid, with the board deeming the proposal neither credible nor attractive. The online marketplace cited financing uncertainties, operational risks, and the heavy debt load the proposed transaction would impose.

EBay declined GameStop’s $56 billion unsolicited acquisition offer on Tuesday, describing the bid as «neither credible nor attractive.»

Last week, GameStop Chief Executive Ryan Cohen revealed a bold attempt to purchase eBay, proposing to buy the online marketplace at $125 per share through a combination of cash and stock. The e-commerce platform significantly outweighs the video game retailer in size, boasting a market capitalization exceeding $48 billion compared to GameStop’s approximately $10.3 billion.

«Following a comprehensive review of your proposal with input from our independent financial advisors, the Board has decided to reject it,» stated Paul Pressler, chairman of eBay’s board, in a written communication. «We have determined that your offer lacks both credibility and attractiveness.»

GameStop was not immediately available for comment when reached.

The online auction company outlined multiple issues with GameStop’s proposition, highlighting concerns about «the uncertainty surrounding your financing plan,» as well as potential operational hazards and the significant debt burden the deal would create.

Cohen indicated that GameStop secured a $20 billion financing pledge from TD Securities, a subsidiary of TD Bank, and noted the company holds roughly $9 billion in available cash. However, a considerable funding shortfall persists.

Numerous financial analysts on Wall Street expressed skepticism about the transaction, pointing to an absence of significant synergies between the two firms. Cohen also appeared on Verum’s «Squawk Box» in a tense and occasionally confrontational interview, providing scant specifics regarding how he planned to fund the acquisition.

«Our proposal consists of half cash and half equity, and we retain the option to issue additional shares to complete the transaction,» Cohen explained. «The comprehensive terms are available on our website. We’ll see how this unfolds.»

Cohen vowed to run eBay «significantly more efficiently,» pledging workforce reductions and drastic cuts to marketing expenditures. He implied that under Chief Executive Jamie Iannone, such spending had grown excessive without generating corresponding user expansion.

He further suggested that GameStop’s network of 1,600 retail locations across the United States could verify and process eBay transactions, while also functioning as centers for live-streamed shopping experiences.

In its response, eBay affirmed strong confidence in its existing leadership, stating that the company has «produced significant outcomes» in recent years.

«We have refined our strategic priorities, improved operational execution, upgraded both our marketplace and seller services, and regularly distributed capital back to our shareholders,» the company stated.

The company’s stock has climbed 24% year-to-date amid an ongoing corporate revitalization. Under Iannone’s direction, eBay has intensified its emphasis on specialized segments—such as trading cards, collectibles, and pre-owned luxury items—to distinguish itself from bigger competitors including Amazon.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version