Connect with us

Technologies

OpenAI trial: Nadella says Musk never raised concerns to him about Microsoft investment

Elon Musk named Microsoft as a defendant in his lawsuit against OpenAI

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella took the stand in the Musk v. Altman trial on Monday, where he testified that Elon Musk never contacted him with concerns that Microsoft’s investments in OpenAI were in violation of any special terms or commitments.
Nadella, wearing a navy suit with a blue tie, concluded his testimony in federal court in Oakland, California, after several hours of questioning. He answered questions about the early days of Microsoft’s strategic partnership with OpenAI, his understanding of the companies’ relationship and his role during the chaotic few days when Sam Altman was briefly ousted as CEO of OpenAI.
Altman’s testimony is slated to begin on Tuesday, according to his lawyers.
In 2024, Musk sued OpenAI, Altman, and the company’s president, Greg Brockman, alleging that they went back on their vow to protect the artificial intelligence company’s nonprofit structure and follow its charitable mission. Microsoft is named as a defendant in the lawsuit, as Musk accuses the company of aiding and abetting OpenAI’s purported breach of charitable trust.
Microsoft has been one of OpenAI’s major backers since 2019, years before the company rocketed into the mainstream with the launch of its ChatGPT chatbot in late 2022. Microsoft’s more than $13 billion worth of investments in OpenAI, including a $1 billion investment in 2019, a $2 billion investment in 2021 and $10 billion in 2023, have come up repeatedly over the course of the trial.
Nadella said he was “very proud” that Microsoft took the risk to invest in OpenAI when “no one else was willing” to bet on the fledgling lab.
Musk, who testified late last month, said Microsoft’s $10 billion investment was the key tipping point that made him believe OpenAI was violating its nonprofit mission. He testified that the scale of the investment bothered him, and it prompted him to open a legal investigation into OpenAI.
“I was concerned they were really trying to steal the charity,” Musk said from the stand.
Nadella said he did not believe Microsoft’s investments in OpenAI were donations, and that there was a clear commercial element to their partnership from the outset.
He said during the partnership’s early years, Microsoft gave OpenAI sharp discounts on computing resources, and Microsoft believed it would reap marketing benefits from doing so.
During a separate video deposition that was played on Monday morning, Michael Wetter, a corporate development executive at Microsoft, said the company has recognized approximately $9.5 billion in revenue to date through its partnership with OpenAI as of March 2025.
Musk co-founded OpenAI alongside Altman, Brockman and a handful of other executives and researchers in 2015. After a number of disagreements about OpenAI’s direction, including a failed effort to join it with his automaker Tesla, Musk left the OpenAI board in 2018. He went on to launch a competing AI startup, xAI, which he merged with SpaceX earlier this year.
OpenAI established a for-profit subsidiary in the months following Musk’s departure, which allowed the company to raise outside funding more easily. Investors, including Microsoft, have since poured billions of dollars into OpenAI’s for-profit arm, and the company’s valuation has swelled to more than $850 billion.
In November 2023, Altman was briefly fired from his role at OpenAI after the board determined he had not been “not consistently candid in his communications.” He was reinstated days later, after an intense few days of negotiations.
Nadella said he was “pretty surprised” by the board’s decision, and that his priority was to try and figure out how to maintain continuity for Microsoft customers. Immediately after Altman was removed, Nadella said he made an effort to learn more about what happened, adding that he suspected jealousy and poor communication was at play.
During conversations with OpenAI board members after the firing, Nadella said he was simply trying to understand the language in the OpenAI’s statement about Altman being “not consistently candid” while communicating with the board.
That language, Nadella said, “just didn’t sort of suffice, because this is the CEO of a company that we are invested in and we’re deeply partnered with, and so I felt that they could have explained to me what are the incidents or what is the detail behind it.”
There must have been instances of jealousy or miscommunication that could have justified pushing out Altman, Nadella said. He wanted more depth from the board members after the remark about candor, but no such information was available, he said.
“It was sort of amateur city, as far as I’m concerned,” Nadella testified.
In October, OpenAI completed a recapitalization that cemented its structure as a nonprofit with an equity stake in its for-profit business. As part of that announcement, Microsoft disclosed that it held a roughly 27% stake in OpenAI’s for-profit unit that was valued at around $135 billion.
The relationship between OpenAI and Microsoft has shown signs of strain in recent months, even as both companies continue to tout it as strategic and core to their businesses. Late last month, the same day that jury selection kicked off in Musk v. Altman, the companies announced a revamped partnership agreement that allows OpenAI to cap revenue share payments and serve customers across any cloud provider.
OpenAI said in a release that the agreement aimed to “simplify our partnership and the way we work together.”
Musk testified that he is not entirely against OpenAI having a for-profit unit, but he said it became “the tail wagging the dog.” He repeatedly accused Altman and Brockman of enriching themselves from a charity while also reaping the positive associations that come from running a nonprofit.
“Microsoft has their own motivations, and that would be different from the motivations of the charity,” Musk said from the stand. “All due respect to Microsoft, do you really want Microsoft controlling digital superintelligence?”
During a videotaped deposition shown in court last week, former OpenAI director Tasha McCauley recalled a discussion with Nadella and her fellow board members after the 2023 decision to dismiss Altman as OpenAI’s CEO.
“To the best of my recollection, Satya wanted to restore things to as they had been,” McCauley said. The board members didn’t think that was the right move, she said.
But as a court witness on Monday, Nadella said he never demanded that the board reinstate Altman as OpenAI CEO.
Musk lawyer Steven Molo showed Nadella screenshots of text messages Nadella had exchanged with Kevin Scott, Microsoft’s technology chief, about potential candidates to join OpenAI’s board.
Among those named in the conversation were Coinbase Chief Operating Officer Emilie Choi, former Eventbrite CEO Julia Hartz, former Gates Foundation CEO Sue Desmond-Hellmann, former Klein Perkins Caufield & Byers investor Bing Gordon, former Xerox CEO Ursula Burns, former LinkedIn CEO Jeff Weiner and former Alphabet director Diane Greene.
In 2015, Google bought Greene’s company Bebop, and she took over Google’s cloud division. In 2019, she left Google and the Alphabet board.
Nadella said “no” in a text message regarding Greene taking an OpenAI board seat. On Monday, he said that he was opposed because Greene, at the time, was affiliated with Google or had been until recently.
“I thought there were going to be conflicts because of our major competition with Google,” he said.
Nadella said that when he became Microsoft’s CEO in 2014, Google had been its main competitor in AI, following the search advertising company’s acquisition of AI lab DeepMind.
OpenAI announced the appointment of Desmond-Hellmann to its board in March 2024.
“I had known her from the past,” Nadella said.
Molo also asked about an email Nadella had sent in 2022 to Microsoft executives regarding terms that would be favorable when collaborating with OpenAI.
“I don’t want to be IBM and OpenAI to be Microsoft,” Nadella wrote.
In 1980, IBM signed a non-exclusive agreement to distribute Microsoft’s DOS operating system on IBM personal computers. The deal allowed Microsoft to do business around DOS with several other PC makers, leading the software to become pervasive. Later, Microsoft sold licenses of its Windows operating system to device makers, cementing its role in information technology.
“Eventually Microsoft grew to be a much more prominent and important company than IBM, correct?” Molo asked.
“That’s right,” Nadella said.
As of market close on Monday, Microsoft’s market capitalization stood at $3 trillion, while IBM was worth $210 billion.
OpenAI co-founder Sutskever takes the stand
After Nadella concluded his testimony, Ilya Sutskever, a former OpenAI co-founder and a renowned AI researcher, was called to the stand. Sutskever was wearing a blue button-down shirt, and he answered questions about his decision to join the company, his communications with Musk and his involvement in Altman’s ouster.
Sutskever used to work at Google, and he testified that the company offered to pay him as much as $6 million a year to try and keep him from leaving for OpenAI. He was one of the employees who eventually expressed concerns about Altman’s behavior to the board, in part because he said he felt “a great deal of ownership” over the startup.
“I simply cared for it, and I didn’t want it to be destroyed,” Sutskever said.
Bret Taylor, chairman of the board at OpenAI, followed Sutskever on the stand. He explained OpenAI’s structure to the jury, and he also spoke about the “dire” period when Altman was removed as chief executive.
Taylor did not finish his testimony before proceedings concluded on Monday, so he will be back on the stand on Tuesday at 8:30 a.m. PT.
— CNBC’s Lora Kolodny contributed to this report.
WATCH: The Musk vs. OpenAI trial is underway — here’s where things stand

Technologies

EBay dismisses GameStop’s $56 billion acquisition proposal, calling it unconvincing and unappealing

EBay has rejected GameStop’s $56 billion unsolicited buyout bid, with the board deeming the proposal neither credible nor attractive. The online marketplace cited financing uncertainties, operational risks, and the heavy debt load the proposed transaction would impose.

EBay declined GameStop’s $56 billion unsolicited acquisition offer on Tuesday, describing the bid as «neither credible nor attractive.»

Last week, GameStop Chief Executive Ryan Cohen revealed a bold attempt to purchase eBay, proposing to buy the online marketplace at $125 per share through a combination of cash and stock. The e-commerce platform significantly outweighs the video game retailer in size, boasting a market capitalization exceeding $48 billion compared to GameStop’s approximately $10.3 billion.

«Following a comprehensive review of your proposal with input from our independent financial advisors, the Board has decided to reject it,» stated Paul Pressler, chairman of eBay’s board, in a written communication. «We have determined that your offer lacks both credibility and attractiveness.»

GameStop was not immediately available for comment when reached.

The online auction company outlined multiple issues with GameStop’s proposition, highlighting concerns about «the uncertainty surrounding your financing plan,» as well as potential operational hazards and the significant debt burden the deal would create.

Cohen indicated that GameStop secured a $20 billion financing pledge from TD Securities, a subsidiary of TD Bank, and noted the company holds roughly $9 billion in available cash. However, a considerable funding shortfall persists.

Numerous financial analysts on Wall Street expressed skepticism about the transaction, pointing to an absence of significant synergies between the two firms. Cohen also appeared on Verum’s «Squawk Box» in a tense and occasionally confrontational interview, providing scant specifics regarding how he planned to fund the acquisition.

«Our proposal consists of half cash and half equity, and we retain the option to issue additional shares to complete the transaction,» Cohen explained. «The comprehensive terms are available on our website. We’ll see how this unfolds.»

Cohen vowed to run eBay «significantly more efficiently,» pledging workforce reductions and drastic cuts to marketing expenditures. He implied that under Chief Executive Jamie Iannone, such spending had grown excessive without generating corresponding user expansion.

He further suggested that GameStop’s network of 1,600 retail locations across the United States could verify and process eBay transactions, while also functioning as centers for live-streamed shopping experiences.

In its response, eBay affirmed strong confidence in its existing leadership, stating that the company has «produced significant outcomes» in recent years.

«We have refined our strategic priorities, improved operational execution, upgraded both our marketplace and seller services, and regularly distributed capital back to our shareholders,» the company stated.

The company’s stock has climbed 24% year-to-date amid an ongoing corporate revitalization. Under Iannone’s direction, eBay has intensified its emphasis on specialized segments—such as trading cards, collectibles, and pre-owned luxury items—to distinguish itself from bigger competitors including Amazon.

Continue Reading

Technologies

‘The haters will hate’: Dan Ives predicts Nasdaq 30,000 as AI rally expands

A solid tech earnings season has seen investor jitters earlier this year evaporate

The Nasdaq will rise to 30,000 points in the next year as a bumper earnings season continues to bolster enthusiasm for AI stocks, Dan Ives, managing director at Wedbush Securities, told CNBC’s Squawk Box Europe on Monday.
A solid tech earnings season has seen investor jitters earlier this year replaced with bullishness over the AI infrastructure buildout. At close on Friday the Nasdaq Composite ended at 26,247.08, marking a 12.93% increase so far this year.
“These earnings have validated the AI bullish thesis,” Ives said. “Demand and supply is 10-1 for chips. We are in the early days still of the AI revolution. The haters will hate, and we know that.”
Michael Burry of “Big Short” fame on Friday warned that the stock market’s fixation on AI is beginning to resemble the final stages of the dot-com bubble.
“Stocks are not up or down because of jobs or consumer sentiment,” Burry wrote. “They are going straight up because they have been going straight up. On a two letter thesis that everyone thinks they understand. … Feeling like the last months of the 1999-2000 bubble.”
But Ives is backing the AI rally to continue for another two years.
“It’s a memory super-cycle,” he said, referring to the unprecedented demand for memory chips sparked by a rapid AI infrastructure buildout. “When it comes to SK Hynix [and other memory companies] we’re very bullish in what we’re seeing there.”
“It’s about playing the hyperscalers — of course chips, then you have to play software, cybersecurity, infrastructure [and] power. You can’t just own one subsector, you have to own the derivative plays,” Ives said.
Over the past month, Nasdaq’s PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index — comprising the 30 largest U.S.-traded chip companies — has soared 38%. Intel, Nvidia, Apple and Alphabet have all enjoyed double-digit growth.
Paul Tudor Jones, founder and chief investment officer of Tudor Investment, also told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Thursday that the AI-fueled bull market still has further to run, but added there could be some “breathtaking” valuation corrections in time.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Hassett says AI isn’t costing anybody their job right now — but tech layoffs keep coming

Tech companies have continued to announce layoffs tied to AI, including recent cuts from Amazon, Meta and Oracle.

White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Monday shrugged off any negative impact of artificial intelligence on employment, saying the emergent technology isn’t costing anyone their jobs right now.
“There’s no sign in the data that AI is costing anybody their job right now, but we are studying the future of AI and what it means for the workforce, so we’ve got a big taskforce on that,” Hassett told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”
Hassett’s comments come amid a wave of tech layoffs, as companies like Amazon, Meta and Oracle have announced rounds of job cuts, with some emphasizing AI’s role in automating work and boosting productivity with lower headcounts.
Block announced that it would lay off nearly 4,000 employees in February, reducing the firm’s headcount by nearly half.
“We are choosing to shift how we operate at a time when our business is accelerating and we see an opportunity to move faster with smaller, highly talented teams using AI to automate more work,” wrote Block CFO Amrita Ahuja at the time of the announcement.
Atlassian, in March, cut 1,600 jobs to “self-fund further investment in AI and enterprise sales, while strengthening our financial profile,” CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes said in a blog post.
Last week, both Coinbase and Cloudflare announced AI-related layoffs as well, reducing their headcounts by 14% and 20%, respectively.
“Over the past year, I’ve watched engineers use AI to ship in days what used to take a team weeks. Non-technical teams are now shipping production code and many of our workflows are being automated,” wrote Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong in a May 5 announcement, expanding on crypto’s current market pressures and how AI is “changing how we work.”
Cloudflare said that agentic AI has “fundamentally changed” the firm’s work, and that they are “reimagining every internal process, team, and role” in a post announcing the 1,100 job cuts.
“We are our own most demanding customer. Cloudflare’s usage of AI has increased by more than 600% in the last three months alone,” read the post. “Employees across the company from engineering to HR to finance to marketing run thousands of AI agent sessions each day to get their work done.”
Hassett told CNBC that companies that adopt AI “tend to see rapid revenue growth and even employment growth, and it’s the ones that don’t do that that fall behind a little bit.”
The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for additional comment.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version