Connect with us

Technologies

Try These Wordle-Like Games for a Fun Challenge

Some of these word and puizzle games are more casual, while others can be pretty difficult.

In 2021, Josh Wardle launched the wildly popular word game Wordle. Then in 2022 the New York Times bought the game. If you’re unfamiliar with Wordle, it asks players to figure out a five-letter word in six or fewer guesses (we have a two-step strategy to help you solve the puzzle every time). After each guess, the game shows gray blocks for the wrong letters, yellow blocks for the right letters in the wrong spot and green blocks for the right letters in the correct spot. 

CNET’s Gael Cooper has loads of tips and tricks to tackle each NY Times Wordle puzzle. If you’ve finished your daily Wordle and are still craving a good puzzle game, there are plenty to choose from.

Here are 10 other puzzle games you can play now.

Connections

Another New York Times-owned puzzle, Connections is a tricky word game. «Players must select four groups of four words without making more than four mistakes,» the New York Times wrote on X. There are also four color-coded difficulty levels for each game; yellow is the easiest, then green, then blue and finally purple. The game is also similar to the BBC quiz show Only Connect, and the show’s host took to X to point out the connection. See what I did there?

You can play Connections on any web browser but you need a New York Times subscription (which starts at $1 a week) to play.

Strands

Strands is another New York Times-owned puzzle but this game resembles a word search more so than Wordle and Connections. This game presents a theme every day to help you find words in a grid. In Strands words can appear forward, backward, top-to-bottom or any number of ways in a traditional word search, and words can also form in the shape of an «L» or have a zigzag in them. When you find a word, tap the first letter and drag your finger to the other letters. Every letter in the puzzle is used, so if you still have letters that aren’t connected to words, you aren’t finished yet.

You can play Strands on any web browser but you need a New York Times subscription (again, $1 a week) to play.

Quartiles

Quartiles is a new word game Apple News Plus subscribers can access on their iPhone or iPad that’s running iOS 17.5 or later. In this word game, you’re given 20 tiles with letters on them and you’re trying to put them together to form different words. The longest words are four tiles long, and these are called Quartiles. The game can be tough but finding just one of the Quartiles is as satisfying as remembering something that was just on the tip of your tongue.

You can play Quartiles on an iPhone or iPad but you need an Apple News subscription (which starts at $13 a month) to play.

Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.

Multiple Wordle spinoffs: Dordle, Quordle, Octordle and Sedecordle

Are you up for a challenge? If you love Wordle and want puzzle games that take more brain power, you’ll want to check out either Dordle, Quordle, Octordle or Sedecordle. Each of these word games resembles Wordle, but they add more rows, columns and words to solve. Each game requires you to simultaneously solve a different number of words at once: Dordle has you solving two words, Quordle four at once, Octordle eight at once and Sedecordle a whopping 16. Good luck.

You can play Dordle, Quordle, Octordle or Sedecordle on any web browser.

Lewdle

«Lewdle is a game about rude words,» this game’s content advisory reads. «If you’re likely to be offended by the use of profanity, vulgarity or obscenity, it likely isn’t for you.» Translation: It’s Wordle but with bad words. The words range from mild — like poopy — to words that would make a sailor blush. Thankfully, despite this game’s content warning, slurs are not included. Like Wordle, gray, yellow and green blocks are used in the same way and there’s only one puzzle per day. So go forth and let the bad words flow!

You can play Lewdle on any web browser. You can also download this game from Apple’s App Store or the Google Play store.

Antiwordle

Tired of seeing those gray, yellow and green blocks plastered all over your social media feed? Give Antiwordle a try. While Wordle wants you to guess a word in as few tries as possible, Antiwordle wants you to avoid the word by guessing as many times as possible. When you guess, letters will turn gray, yellow or red. Gray means the letter isn’t in the word and can’t be used again, yellow means the letter is in the word and must be included in each subsequent guess and red means the letter is in the exact position within the word and is locked in place. If you can use every letter on the keyboard without getting the word correct, you win. Honestly, I’ve found this version of Wordle to be much harder than the original.

You can play Antiwordle on any web browser.

Absurdle

Absurdle bills itself as the «adversarial version» of Wordle. While Wordle nudges you in the right direction with each guess, Absurdle is trying to avoid giving you the correct answer. According to the game’s website, «With each guess, Absurdle reveals as little information as possible, changing the secret word if need be.» Absurdle doesn’t pick a word at the beginning of the game for the player to guess. Instead, it uses the player’s guesses to narrow its list of words down in an effort to make the game go as long as possible. The final word might not even include a yellow letter from one of your earlier guesses either. You can guess as many times as you want, which is helpful, and the best score you can get is four. Have fun!

You can play Absurdle on any web browser.

For more word game fun, check out CNET’s Wordle tips, the best Wordle jokes and everything you need to know about the word game. You can also check out what to know about the other New York Times-owned games, Connections and Strands.

Related Topics:

Technologies

Anthropic Reins In Subscribers’ Unlimited AI Use for OpenClaw

It may be the year of the AI agent but Claude’s «all-you-can-eat buffet» is over.

Anthropic over the weekend told subscribers they’d have to pay up for heavy use of its Claude AI models to power third-party agents like OpenClaw. 

Users with monthly subscriptions can still use Claude models, including Opus, Sonnet and Haiku, through these third-party agents. But you’ll have to pay via Anthropic’s API or use a «pay-as-you-go option» that will be billed separately from your Claude subscription payment.

«The $20/month all-you-can-eat buffet just closed,» wrote AI product manager Aakash Gupta on X. 

At the same time, Anthropic recently announced new features that bring some of the things that made OpenClaw so popular into Claude itself. Claude can use your computer, even if you’re not at it, for example. 

Why this policy matters 

There has been growing tension between OpenAI and Anthropic, recently inflamed by the controversies involving contracts with the US Defense Department. But there is also tension between users who want to run autonomous AI agents constantly and the AI labs that are trying to control costs by managing the tasks their models are used for. 

Claude is a chatbot that was created to be prompted by humans, not for millions of AI agents to use it for workflows. These agent tools, like Manis and OpenClaw, require much more power to run and burn through tokens faster than regular human chatting. Anthropic has already taken steps to address the demand that heavy agent users bring, like a five-hour session cap during peak periods for the models.

«We’ve been working to manage demand across the board, but these tools put an outsized strain on our systems,» Anthropic wrote in its email to customers.

OpenAI has been all-in on agentic tools. Early this year, the AI company hired Peter Steinberger, the creator of OpenClaw, with the aim of bringing AI agents to a broad audience. Steinberger was vocal about his critiques of Anthropic’s new policy, taking to X over the weekend. 

«Funny how timings match up, first they copy some popular features into their closed harness, then they lock out open source,» he wrote. 

(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET’s parent company, in 2025 filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)

The future of agent compute power 

Friction between heavy agent users and AI companies is likely to get worse. These AI agent tools are extremely powerful: they can run for hours, take actions across apps like Gmail, Slack and iMessage, and work autonomously much longer and faster than a human could. Because of this power, they are far more costly and require far more power to run compared to a human prompting a bot. It’s likely that AI companies will increasingly push these compute costs onto heavy users through price increases or steps like those taken by Anthropic.

Continue Reading

Technologies

My Running Tests Left Me Feeling Like the Moto Watch Is Low-Key Catfishing

The Polar partnership and $150 price tag had me sold. Then I actually lived with it.

The Moto Watch feels like a kid trying their hardest to stand out in a sport, only to walk away with a participation trophy. Having spent years reviewing pricey fitness trackers and smartwatches, I know how rare it is for a relatively affordable $150 device to arrive with real fitness credibility, so I was genuinely rooting for this one. When Motorola announced a partnership with Polar, along with dual-band GPS and week-long battery life at this price, it sounded like a breakthrough moment. I thought this could be Motorola’s big return to relevance in wearables.

Then I actually used it for a few weeks and reality set in.

Motorola isn’t a stranger to this space. The Moto 360 helped define early Android wearables back in 2014, and made a strong impression doing so. But the years since have been relatively slow on its wearables front. This new Moto Watch is its most serious attempt at breaking through the space in a while, and the Polar partnership gives it a level of fitness-tracking street cred that’s rare at this price.

But theory and execution don’t quite align here. At $150, the Moto Watch isn’t trying to compete directly with higher-end wearables from Samsung or Google; rather, it’s trying to carve out a league of its own with this big-screen 47mm watch. And it’s no home run — yet.

The Polar partnership, tested

The Polar integration is the headline feature that had me excited to put it through the paces. The brand is synonymous with accuracy among serious endurance athletes, and its H10 chest strap is the gold standard we reach for at CNET for heart rate benchmarking on other devices.

So I took both to a college track — three miles (12 laps) — with the watch unpaired from my phone and the chest strap recording simultaneously for comparison. The watch consistently kept up, but I noticed it struggled to keep pace during my sprints.

The workout summaries showed similar numbers, which is why I prefer exporting the raw, second-by-second heart rate data to get more granular. The Polar app makes it easy to export a spreadsheet of your HR data, but the Moto Watch is running it’s own app, and there was no export option. I had to settle for comparing the snapshot of metrics that I got from the workout summary. 

The graphs looked similar at first glance, with matching peaks and valleys during the laps when I picked up my pace. The average heart rate was only one beat off from the chest strap. But the watch seemed to smooth out the spikes, and the max heart rate was off by seven beats (173 bpm on the watch versus 180 bpm on the chest strap). That kind of gap is pretty standard for wrist-based tracking, which measures blood flow rather than the heart’s electrical signals. Still, you may not be getting full credit for your effort if you plan to use this as a serious training tool.

Distance tracking was another reality check. Dual-band GPS is usually reserved for higher-end sports watches, so I had high hopes that the Moto Watch would be right on track. It took a while to lock onto a satellite and dropped connection more than once during my 30-minute run. By the end, it had given me 0.15 miles of extra credit. That’s about a 5% error rate, which sounds small until you’re training for a half-marathon and your long runs keep coming back inflated. It’s fine for casual activity tracking, but this is no Garmin replacement.

Health features

Away from the track, the Polar integration holds up better. The watch monitors heart rate, blood oxygen and stress levels throughout the day, though it lacks more advanced features such as ECG or temperature tracking. Wear it to bed (if you can) and you’ll get sleep stages plus a Nightly Recharge Status, Polar’s version of a recovery or readiness score that can help guide training intensity.

But it’s just too bulky to wear comfortably while sleeping. I only wore it to bed once during my month-long testing journey because I felt like the larger size got in the way of my sleep quality. Admittedly, I’m averse to sleeping with accessories on; I don’t even wear my wedding ring to bed. Testing wearables always means making a few concessions, but the Moto Watch just didn’t make the cut for what I’m willing to put up with. It’s definitely more Garmin Fēnix 8 Pro level bulk than Pixel Watch, which I’m ok wearing to bed. 

Design: It screams ‘bro’

Motorola positioned this watch as the Clark Kent of smartwatches: a fitness watch cloaked in a polished suit that can go from sweat session to the boardroom. That was the pitch. What landed on my desk, was a different picture with much less polish than I had envisioned. Strapping it on only made matters worse, because it’s 47mm watch looked (and felt) as if it had swallowed my 6.5-inch wrist.

The 1.43-inch OLED touchscreen wasn’t the problem — that was the bright spot. It’s more responsive and more vivid than you’d expect at this price, with slim bezels thanks to a cleverly positioned dial.

You also get a rotating crown for scrolling or clicks, plus a programmable side button. The aluminum case looks polished, too, but it’s easy to miss. The oversized black silicone straps run straight into the frame with no visual break, making the whole thing look like one continuous slab.

Turns out all it needed was a stylist. The desperation of having to wear this thing for weeks put me in problem-solving mode, and I realized the straps were standard width (22mm) and easily swappable with third-party bands you can buy anywhere. Once I switched them, it finally looked like the watch Motorola had sold me. It still screamed «bro,» but it was board room bro.

A battery that just won’t quit  

After a three-mile outdoor run with GPS active and no phone, plus a full day of notifications popping up on its always-on display, most flagships would be down to their last breath, but not the Moto Watch. This smartwatch barely broke a sweat and finished the day at 85% battery. 

With the always-on display (and no sleep tracking), I made it a full week on a full charge. Switch the screen activation from always-on to raise to wake and Motorola promises it will last 13 days, which I didn’t test, but it seems totally feasible. This is impressive even by sports watch standards.

For the right person, battery life alone could be the reason to buy this. 

App, setup and smartwatch functionality

Out of the box, the watch has notifications turned off and set to raise to wake (probably to help get you to the promised 13 days of battery life). And while that might work for some people, I spent most of my first day wondering why nothing was happening on my wrist. If you like to get a heads-up on what’s going on in your phone, I suggest you dig into settings before you start wearing it.

I was skeptical because the watch runs on Motorola’s proprietary software rather than Android’s Wear OS, though it seems like a very bare-bones knockoff. Text previews come through, call notifications work and basic alert handling is fine. But there are a lot of trade-offs that left me wondering why they went rogue in the first place, especially because it still only works with Android phones. It doesn’t support message replies from the wrist, Google Assistant, NFC payments or much of a third-party app ecosystem. For replacing quick glances at your phone notifications, it works. For anyone hoping to actually interact with their phone from their wrist or use their smartwatch to pay for riding a train, it falls short.

The phone app combines health and technical features into one interface, which takes some getting used to, but it ultimately works. It’s a hybrid of Fitbit’s health widget layout and Apple’s activity ring system — almost a blatant borrow, but an effective one for visualizing daily steps, active minutes and calories.

A pricing identity crisis

The Moto Watch is priced to feel like a deal: stellar battery life, dual-band GPS, Polar-backed tracking, blood oxygen, sleep stages and a screen that outperforms its price. On a spec sheet, it punches above its weight.

But $150 is a tricky number. It’s not cheap enough to be an obvious budget pick, and it’s not capable enough to compete at Polar-level performance. The sensor limitations and lack of data export put a ceiling on what that partnership can actually deliver.

Instead, it sits at an awkward intersection, more of a first attempt at carving out something in between. The bones are good. The execution needs work.

Who is this for?

If you’re an Android phone owner who wants sportswatch-level battery life in a sleeker package, this one might be worth a second glance. It’s best suited for casual fitness trackers who want a watch that covers the basics. Serious athletes will want something more precise.

But deal-seekers could be better off with the $160 Fitbit Charge 6 for its additional features or one of the truly budget watches made by Amazfit such as the Bip 6 and Active 2. Style options are limited, and there’s no cycle tracking, so it’s also less appealing for women looking for those features.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Today’s NYT Connections: Sports Edition Hints and Answers for April 6, #560

Here are hints and the answers for the NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle for April 6 No. 560.

Looking for the most recent regular Connections answers? Click here for today’s Connections hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle and Strands puzzles.

Today’s Connections: Sports Edition is a tough one. If you’re struggling with today’s puzzle but still want to solve it, read on for hints and the answers.

Connections: Sports Edition is published by The Athletic, the subscription-based sports journalism site owned by The Times. It doesn’t appear in the NYT Games app, but it does in The Athletic’s own app. Or you can play it for free online.

Read more: NYT Connections: Sports Edition Puzzle Comes Out of Beta

Hints for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Here are four hints for the groupings in today’s Connections: Sports Edition puzzle, ranked from the easiest yellow group to the tough (and sometimes bizarre) purple group.

Yellow group hint: City of Angels.

Green group hint: Winter football.

Blue group hint: Like Hemsworth, but in hoops.

Purple group hint: Cinderellas.

Answers for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Yellow group: A Los Angeles athlete.

Green group: College football bowl games.

Blue group: Basketball Chrises.

Purple group: Men’s NCAA tournament 16-seeds.

Read more: Wordle Cheat Sheet: Here Are the Most Popular Letters Used in English Words

What are today’s Connections: Sports Edition answers?

The yellow words in today’s Connections

The theme is a Los Angeles athlete. The four answers are Clipper, King, Ram and Spark.

The green words in today’s Connections

The theme is college football bowl games. The four answers are Fiesta, Orange, Rose and Sugar.

The blue words in today’s Connections

The theme is basketball Chrises. The four answers are Bosh, Mullin, Paul and Webber.

The purple words in today’s Connections

The theme is men’s NCAA tournament 16-seeds. The four answers are Howard, Long Island, Prairie View A&M and Siena.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version