Connect with us

Technologies

Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Z Fold 6: Slimmer Body, Bigger Screens and Slightly Higher Price

Samsung’s new book-style foldable has big upgrades on its predecessor — so how do they stack up?

At Samsung Unpacked in July, the phonemaker introduced its most advanced foldable yet: the Galaxy Z Fold 7. It supersedes last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 6 with upgrades big and small (or rather, big and thin), but how exactly do they compare? Here’s the Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Galaxy Z Fold 6 specs comparison. 

Samsung has been releasing foldable phones for over half a decade now since the initial Galaxy Fold (no «Z» back then) launched in 2019, and the company has gotten pretty good at the newer smartphone format. Gone are the days of display and hinge durability issues; now, Samsung’s foldable phones are as reliable as their flat counterparts… though at $2,000, the Z Fold series’ prices are still high enough to put them out of reach of all but deep-pocketed enthusiasts.

The Z Fold 7 packs the latest Samsung upgrades and some design innovations, while the Z Fold 6 is still a powerful and capable device, leaving either a great choice for those who can afford them — just note the $100 difference in list price, as all those upgrades have led the Z Fold 7 to start at $2,000 while the Z Fold 6 starts at $1,900. Here’s how both foldable phones compare.

Design and display

Both the Z Fold 7 and Z Fold 6 follow the same broad design: a book-style foldable that has an outer screen to function more or less like a flat smartphone when folded closed. It can be unfolded to reveal its wider, more tablet-like inner display, providing more screen real estate for tasks, games and watching media. 

The Z Fold 7, however, takes the Z Fold 6’s design and slims down its thickness so it takes up even less space in pockets or bags. The Z Fold 7 is 8.9mm when folded up, down from 12.1mm thick in the folded-up Z Fold 6. Likewise, when unfolded, the Z Fold 7 is only 4.2mm thick, down from the 5.6mm in the Z Fold 6. That’s even thinner than the Galaxy S25 Edge’s 5.8mm thickness, which commands an $1,100 price because of its own deliberately thin and light design. 

While users may not see how much thinner the Z Fold 7 is unless they put it side by side with another phone, there are areas where it’s noticeably trimmed down — there’s hardly any bezel left around the top and bottom of the USB-C port. The new foldable comes in at 215 grams, which is about the weight of most flatphones and lighter than the Z Fold 6’s 239 grams.

Both foldables are IP48 rated for dust and water resistance, meaning while they may survive being dunked in water for at least 30 minutes (the «8» in that rating) they won’t protect against molecules smaller than 1mm (the «4» in that rating, lower than the «6» in most phones’ IP68 rating) — so keep either foldable away from dust and sand.

Read more: I Held the Galaxy Z Fold 7. It’s So Thin I Almost Forgot It’s a Foldable

The Z Fold 7 is overall slightly taller and wider than its predecessor, which results in bigger screens. The new foldable has a 6.5-inch AMOLED Full HD Plus (2,520×1,080 pixels) cover display, up from the 6.3-inch AMOLED Full HD Plus (2,376×968 pixels) cover display on the Z Fold 6. Both models have 1 to 120Hz variable refresh rates. 

Similarly, the Z Fold 7 has a larger 8-inch AMOLED tablet-like (2,184×1,968 pixels) inner display compared to the Z Fold 6’s 7.6-inch AMOLED tablet-like (2,160×1,856 pixels) inner display. Both also have 1 to 120Hz variable refresh rates.

Cameras

The Z Fold 7’s camera array is mostly unchanged from last year’s model, with one glaring exception: the 200-megapixel main camera, which it inherits from the Galaxy S25 Ultra that launched in January (and also made it to the Galaxy S25 Edge that arrived in May). While we haven’t had much time to try it out, the Z Fold 7’s main camera should take sharper photos than the 50-megapixel one on last year’s Z Fold 6.

On paper, the Z Fold 7’s remaining cameras seem otherwise identical to their counterparts on the Z Fold 6: a 12-megapixel ultrawide camera, 10-megapixel 3x telephoto and a 10-megapixel front-facing camera on the cover screen. The 10-megapixel camera on its internal display is now inside of a display cutout, moving away from the under-display camera that prior Fold phones used.

Both foldables shoot video in 8K at 30 frames per second.

Specs and battery

It’s not surprising that the Z Fold 7 gets a boost in specs over last year’s Z Fold 6. The most notable is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite in the Z Fold 7, which is more powerful and efficient than the Z Fold 6’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.

The Z Fold 7 has the same internal storage options as its predecessor: 256GB, 512GB and 1TB. But whereas the Z Fold 6 only offered 12GB of RAM for all three of those storage options, the new foldable kicks it up a notch by offering 16GB of RAM for its largest storage (the 256GB and 512GB are again paired with 12GB of RAM). 

The Z Fold 7 has the same 4,400mAh battery capacity as last year’s Z Fold 6. But until we test out the new foldable, we won’t know whether its particular setup will result in more or less battery life — the slightly larger displays on the Z Fold 7 would suggest it would drain its battery faster, and prior testing with Snapdragon 8 Elite phones found they drained more power.

Connectivity-wise, the Z Fold 7 has the edge with its Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 support, which are newer and more advanced than the Z Fold 6’s Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 support.

But there’s still one area where the Z Fold 7 remains painfully behind the times: charging. The foldable still has 25-watt maximum charging, which is pretty dismal and borderline embarrassing in 2025 for a phone of this price — even the flawed OnePlus Open that launched in 2023 had faster 67-watt charging, which filled that foldable from dead to 76% in half an hour. As a point of comparison, last year’s Z Fold 6 (also 25 watts) recharged just over 40% in 30 minutes. 

Both phones also have Qi wireless charging. Samsung is selling magnetic cases for the Fold 7 that add compatibility with Qi2 wireless chargers and other magnetic accessories.

Software, support and AI

The Galaxy Z Fold 7 launches with Samsung’s One UI 8 and Android 16 out of the box, which is an improvement over the Z Fold 6 arriving with Android 14. Yes, despite being a year apart, Samsung’s biggest foldable will arrive with the newest version of Google’s mobile operating system, which the software giant surprise-dropped back in June months ahead of its usual release window.

While this is obviously a big win for the new foldable to not have to wait weeks or months for Android 16, it’s also a longevity upgrade: Samsung is once again promising seven years of software and security updates for the Z Fold 7, which means it should get annual upgrades until 2032. But while the Z Fold 6 has the same number of upgrades, one of those was Android 15 that came out later in its launch year — meaning it should only get upgrades until 2030.

Both folding phones get the full suite of Samsung’s Galaxy AI features as well as Gemini access. From Google’s Circle To Search to erasing objects in photos, there’s a range of little tools and tricks. But because the Z Fold 7 gets more years of Android updates (and has a newer processor), it could get more Galaxy AI features in the future.

Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Galaxy Z Fold 6

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Cover display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate 6.5-inch AMOLED, 2,520×1,080p, 1-120Hz refresh rate 6.3-inch AMOLED; 2,376×968 pixels; 1-120Hz variable refresh rate
Internal display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate 8-inch AMOLED, 2,184×1,968p, 1-120Hz refresh rate 7.6-inch AMOLED; 2,160×1,856 pixels;1-120Hz variable refresh rate
Pixel density Cover: 422 ppi; Internal display: 368ppi Cover: 410 ppi; Internal: 374 ppi
Dimensions (inches) Open: 5.63 x 6.24 x 0.17 inches; Closed: 2.87 x 6.24 x 0.35 inches Open: 6.04×5.21 x0.22 in; Closed: 6.04×2.68×0.48 in
Dimensions (millimeters) Open: 143.2 x 158.4 x 4.2mm; Closed: 72.8 x 158.4 x 8.9mm Open: 153.5×132.5×5.6mm; Closed: 153.5×68.1×12.1mm
Weight (grams, ounces) 215g (7.58 oz.) 239g (8.43 oz)
Mobile software Android 16 Android 14
Cameras 200-megapixel (main), 12-megapixel (ultrawide), 10-megapixel (telephoto), 10-megapixel (cover screen, selfie) 50-megapixel (wide), 12-megapixel (ultrawide), 10-megapixel (3x telephoto)
Internal screen camera 10-megapixel 4-megapixel (inner screen under-display); 10-megapixel (cover screen)
Video capture 8K at 30fps 8K
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
RAM/storage 12GB + 256GB, 12GB + 512GB, 16GB + 1TB 12GB + 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
Expandable storage No None
Battery 4,400 mAh 4,400 mAh
Fingerprint sensor Yes Side
Connector USB-C USB-C
Headphone jack No None
Special features One UI 8, 25W wired charging speed, Qi wireless charging, 2,600-nit peak brightness, Galaxy AI, NFC, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, IP48 water resistance IP48 rating, 25W wired charging, wireless charging + powershare, 3x optical zoom (up to 10x digital and 30x Space Zoom with AI Super Resolution tech)
US price starts at $2,000 (256GB) $1,900 (256GB)
UK price starts at £1,799 (256GB) £1,799 (256GB)
Australia price starts at AU$2,899 (256GB) AU$2,749 (256GB)

Technologies

Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Thursday, July 17

Here are the answers for The New York Times Mini Crossword for July 17.

Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.


I breezed through today’s Mini Crossword. There’s a little something for everyone. Birders will appreciate 3-Down while musicians will immediately know the answer to 6-Down. Read on for an assist with today’s Mini Crossword. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.

The Mini Crossword is just one of many games in the Times’ games collection. If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.

Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword

Let’s get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers.

Mini across clues and answers

1A clue: Workout facilities
Answer: GYMS

5A clue: Pipe dream? Just the opposite!
Answer: LEAK

6A clue: In good spirits
Answer: JOLLY

7A clue: Up to the task
Answer: ABLE

8A clue: Headache-inducing situation
Answer: MESS

Mini down clues and answers

1D clue: Boston newspaper
Answer: GLOBE

2D clue: TALKS LIKE THIS
Answer: YELLS

3D clue: Mallard ducks with green heads, e.g.
Answer: MALES

4D clue: Drone’s zone
Answer: SKY

6D clue: Rock out
Answer: JAM

Continue Reading

Technologies

WeTransfer Backtracks on AI File Training After Backlash: What You Need to Know

The company has updated the changes to its policies after some users objected to new terms.

WeTransfer, the service that allows users to send large files to others, is explaining itself to clients and updating its terms of service after a backlash related to training AI models.

The company published a blog post, «WeTransfer Terms of Service — What’s Really Changing,» that details more updates the company made to its policies, after users noticed that recent changes seemed to suggest WeTransfer was training AI models on the files users are transferring.

In the blog post, the company says: «First things first. Your content is always your content.»

The post goes on to say, «We don’t use machine learning or any form of AI to process content shared via WeTransfer.» WeTransfer explains that its use of AI would be to improve content moderation and enhance its ability to prevent the distribution of harmful content across its platform.

The company adds that those AI tools aren’t being used and haven’t been built yet. «To avoid confusion,» it says, «we’ve removed this reference.» 

A representative for WeTransfer did not immediately return an email seeking further comment.

The backlash over the terms prompted users such as political correspondent Ava Santina to write on X, «Time to stop using WeTransfer who from 8th August have decided they’ll own anything you transfer to power AI.» 

What this means for users

Anxieties are high about what information users share or store in services such as social media accounts is accessed by companies to train AI models. WeTransfer may be used for highly sensitive file transfers, raising fears that private information might be accessed by AI. According to the company, this isn’t the case.

To further explain, the company said in its post:

  • «YES — Your content is always your content. In fact, section 6.2 of our Terms of Service clearly states that you ‘own and retain all right, title, and interest, including all intellectual property rights, in and to the Content’.»
  • «YES — You’re granting us permission to ensure we can run and improve the WeTransfer service properly.»
  • «YES — Our terms are compliant with applicable privacy laws, including the GDPR.»
  • «NO — We are not using your content to train AI models.»
  • «NO — We do not sell your content to third parties.»

When the Terms of Service change

While eagle-eyed experts understood the potential implications of what WeTransfer’s new terms could mean for people using the service, it’s unlikely that most people would be able to spot such changes.

«Expecting users to fully understand Terms of Service is unrealistic. These documents are often too complex to navigate,» says Haibing Lu, associate professor at the Leavey School of Business at Santa Clara University. 

Lu told CNET that companies would do well to clearly highlight any changes they make to AI-related terms and explain them clearly to give people a real choice. «That’s what true transparency looks like,» Lu says. «Companies are increasingly risking backlash when they update Terms of Service to include AI, especially when users’ data is involved.»

Companies including Adobe, Slack and Zoom have had similar issues with terms changes related to AI, but it’s not just AI that’s the problem, Lu says — rather, it’s the lack of transparent communication.

In the case of WeTransfer, Lu says the company’s response, including revising the terms and blogging about them, «was a smart move and helped rebuild trust. It showed they were listening and willing to act fast.»

WeTransfer could include more understandable language in its terms, or communicate the changes better or sooner, Lu says, adding: «Transparency shouldn’t start after a backlash.»

Continue Reading

Technologies

Best Galaxy Z Flip 6 Deals: Get The Previous Generation Foldable for Less Now That the Z Flip 7 Is Available

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version