Connect with us

Technologies

Best Budget Smartwatches: Top Cheap Picks

Who says a good smartwatch can’t be affordable? Our sub-$100 picks hit the mark without compromising on features or battery life.

Our Experts

Written by  Vanessa Hand Orellana
Article updated on June 17, 2025 at 3:37 PM PDT
Vanessa Hand Orellana Lead Writer
Vanessa is a lead writer at CNET, reviewing and writing about the latest smartwatches and fitness trackers. She joined the brand first as an on-camera reporter for CNET’s Spanish-language site, then moved on to the English side to host and produce some of CNET’s videos and YouTube series. When she’s not testing out smartwatches or dropping phones, you can catch her on a hike or trail run with her family.
Expertise Consumer Technology, Smart Home, Family, Apps, Wearables
Why You Can Trust CNET
30+

Years of Experience

35

Product Reviewers

15k

Sq. Feet of Lab Space

CNET staff — not advertisers, partners or business interests — determine how we review products and services. If you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

vs

Compare
Back to selection

There are plenty of affordable smartwatches out there, but only a few are actually worth your time. The sub-$100 category has become the wild west of wearables; crowded with imposters making big claims and delivering on very few. We haven’t tested every bargain-bin watch on the market, but we’ve tested enough to know when we’ve found a rare gem. A watch that goes beyond just the basics, with solid health and fitness tracking, smartphone features that actually work, and a multi-day battery life that can outlast some pricier models. Here are our picks for the best smartwatches (and smartwatch hybrids) under $100, plus a couple of alternatives that almost made the cut. We also share a few tips on what to look for when shopping in this cluttered (and sometimes sketchy) category.

SMARTWATCH DEALS OF THE WEEK

Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

What’s the best cheap smartwatch overall?

The best budget smartwatch by a landslide is the Amazfit Bip 6. This is the kind of watch that makes you forget its sub-$100 price tag, packing features you’d normally expect from models that cost at least twice as much. This includes advanced health metrics like SpO2 (blood oxygen), wrist temperature tracking, stress levels and women’s health insights. It also lasted more than a week on a single charge during our testing, and can be tweaked to stretch even longer with custom settings.

Smartphone integration isn’t as seamless as what you’d get from Wear OS or WatchOS smartwatches, since the Bip 6 runs its own proprietary system. But that also means it’s compatible with both Android phones and iPhones. Just note that iPhone users won’t be able to respond to notifications from the watch.

The Bip 6 delivers where it counts, making it a great option for anyone prioritizing price and willing to spend a little more time setting it up to fit their needs.

Pros

  • $80 price is much less than most watches
  • Works with Android and iOS
  • Great battery life (lasts a week with heavy use)
  • Tracks a wide variety of fitness activities accurately
  • Temperature tracking and advanced sleep monitoring

Cons

  • Single sizing option (44mm) is limiting
  • UI and app are unintuitive
  • Some health metrics are hard to interpret
  • Voice assistant is unreliable
  • Bluetooth range is short (especially on iPhone)

The $80 Amazfit Bip 6 is the most affordable option on this list, and a rare standout in the budget smartwatch category because it delivers on all the basics (and more) without many compromises. The design and interface aren’t as refined as what you’ll find with pricier models, but that feels like a fair trade-off considering how much the Bip 6 gets right. It offers accurate fitness tracking, with customizable training tools like heart rate zones, plus advanced health features including SpO2 (blood oxygen); temperature and sleep tracking; and high and low heart rate alerts.

Why we like it

While its low price might be its main draw, the Amazfit Bip 6 is one of the few sub-$100 smartwatches that’s actually worth your time. Beyond all the features mentioned above, we also like it for its weeklong (or longer) battery life and its compatibility with both iPhones and Android phones.

Who it’s best for

The Amazfit Bip 6 is ideal for anyone looking to try out a smartwatch without making a major investment. It’s a great fit for folks willing to do a bit of customization on the back end to make the watch work for their specific needs.

 … Show more

Pros

  • $60 price is the cheapest entry point into Samsung’s ecosystem
  • Robust health tracking and sleep coaching tools
  • 3-day battery life with always-on display (up to 13 days with lighter use)
  • Slim, lightweight design that looks fancier than most budget trackers

Cons

  • No built-in GPS for phone-free outdoor workouts
  • No voice assistant or dictation features
  • No mobile payments or third-party app support
  • Limited notification handling (can’t initiate calls or texts)

The $60 Galaxy Fit 3 sits right on the line between fitness tracker and true smartwatch. It has a sleek design that’s flattering on most wrists and a simple UI that doesn’t overcomplicate your health data. There are a few concessions given its affordable price and simplicity, like the lack of a voice assistant and true message response, but it’s still plenty for Samsung fans or people looking for an entry-level way to track fitness.

What we like it

At $60, it’s the most affordable entry point into Samsung’s health and fitness ecosystem, which includes metrics like heart rate and SpO₂ monitoring, stress levels, and sleep scores for much less than flagship smartwatches like the Galaxy Watch 7. Its pared-down size and simplified features also give it a battery boost: expect around three days with the always-on display enabled, or up to 13 days in battery saver mode.

Who it’s best for

The Fit 3 is great for anyone looking to track their health and fitness without committing to the price or bulk of a full-fledged smartwatch. It’s best for Samsung users already in the ecosystem, but it can also be paired with other Android phones.

 … Show more

Amazfit Bip 6 specs and features

Spec Galaxy Fit 3 Amazfit Bip 6
Price $60 $79
Display 1.6″ AMOLED (256 × 402, 16 M colors) 1.97″ AMOLED (390 × 450, up to 2,000 nits) (us.amazfit.com)
Body 42.9 × 28.8 × 9.9 mm 46.3 × 40.2 × 10.45 mm
Weight 36.8 g 27.9 g
Materials Aluminum + glass Aluminum frame + polymer case
Water Resistance 5 ATM + IP68 5 ATM
OS FreeRTOS ZeppOS
RAM 16 MB 64 MB
Storage 256 MB 512 MB
Battery 208 mAh 340 mAh
Battery Life Up to 13 days Up to 14 days typical; 26 days saver
Fast Charge 65% in 30 min ?
Connectivity Bluetooth 5.3 Bluetooth 5.2, GPS
GPS No (phone GPS) Yes, built-in, supports offline maps
Sensors Accelerometer, gyro, barometer, optical HR, SpO₂, light BioTracker™ PPG (5PD+2LED), accelerometer, gyro, ambient light, geomagnetic
Notifications Calls, text, media controls Calls, texts, notifications; voice replies on Android
Additional Features 100+ workout modes, sleep, stress 140+ activity modes, Zepp Coach, offline maps, menstrual tracking
Voice Assistant No Zepp Flow voice control
NFC Payments No No
Platform Compatibility Android iOS & Android

Recent updates

In June 2025, we added the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 to our round-up as a simple, more affordable alternative for Samsung fans looking to track their health and fitness.

Factors to consider when choosing a smartwatch

Picking a budget smartwatch can be trickier than it looks, mostly because of the sheer volume of bad options out there. This list is a great place to start, but it’s worth thinking through your priorities (beyond just price)  before you commit. Here’s what to keep in mind when shopping under $100:

Software and UI

If reliability and user-friendly design matter to you, stick with more established brands like Samsung, Fitbit or even other Amazfit options. At this price, you can likely score some older models at a discounted rate or opt for fitness tracker hybrids like the Samsung Fit 3 or the Fitbit Inspire 3 with some smartwatch features that work well with your phone. Samsung pairs seamlessly with Samsung phones, while Fitbit and Amazfit options tend to work reliably across both iOS and Android.

Design

Design is often where budget watches cut corners. Many use plastic cases and silicone bands, which can feel bulkier and look less refined. Screen quality is another trade-off — lower resolution displays can appear grainy or pixelated. If aesthetics matter, consider older models of premium brands or a fitness tracker with a sleeker look. 

Battery Life Battery life claims can be misleading at this price. Make sure what’s advertised for the specific watch reflects typical use, and includes some kind of stripped-down low-power mode that only shows the time. Always-on displays that often accelerate battery drain are rare on wearables under $100, but most watches should last 24 hours (at the bare minimum) using raise-to-wake mode.

Connectivity and GPS

Expect only Wi-Fi models in this range, meaning you won’t be able to make calls or send texts without your phone nearby. Also, check the GPS capability; some watches, like the Bip 6, can track outdoor workouts independently, while others, like the Fit3, rely on your phone for mapping. 

Price

You’re already filtering for watches under $100, but even within that range, you’ll find differences. Going closer to $50 usually means fewer features, but that could be fine if you don’t need all the bells and whistles. If you’re looking for something more well-rounded, the $80 to $100 range tends to offer better value overall.

How we test smartwatches

With budget smartwatches, we follow the same rigorous testing guidelines as their premium counterparts, paying even closer attention to categories where we may see potential trade-offs like sensor accuracy and software support.

The Basics: First, we evaluate how well these watches hold up to real-world use: notifications, texting (if available), and phone pairing. We also review the companion app experience, which is particularly important for budget watches, many of which rely on proprietary apps for health data and customization. Some may lack advanced phone integration — especially for iPhone users — so we flag those limitations in our reviews.

Performance and navigation: While lower-cost models rarely have the processing power of premium options, we assess how smooth and responsive the interface is during typical use. That includes swiping between menus, launching workouts, syncing to the app and responding to notifications (when available).

Design and durability: Affordability doesn’t have to mean cheap build quality. We test for comfort, fit, and how the watch holds up to daily wear and tear. Most budget models don’t come with military-grade durability or high water resistance ratings so we’re not as “rough” on these devices and only go up to what the rating allowed, but will fully acknowledge this trade off in the review.

Battery life: Budget smartwatches tend to outperform premium ones when it comes to battery life because of the lesser-quality screen and power-hungry apps, but it’s not always a given. We start our testing with a fully charged battery and then test how long a watch lasts with normal use. This includes sleep tracking, mirrored notifications from our phone and at least one outdoor (using GPS). Once it’s drained, we’ll time how long it takes to charge back up to 100%. We’ll also flag any battery-saving tactics unique to that model, although our core testing is done at full capacity (not battery-saving mode).

Sensor accuracy: Sensor quality can be hit or miss in this category, so we run side-by-side comparisons with gold-standard tools. For heart rate, we test against a chest strap during cardio workouts. For SpO2, we use a fingertip pulse oximeter. For watches with built-in GPS, we also assess how quickly the GPS locks in for outdoor workouts and compare its accuracy to a smartphone GPS (separate from the one it’s paired to). We’ll call out any obvious inconsistencies in route and tracking.

Ultimately, we’re looking for watches that deliver true value and not just a long spec sheet of half baked-features.

Other smartwatches we’ve tested

We’ve also tested the Amazfit Active 2, which shares a lot of the same great features as the Bip 6 but comes in a smaller, circular design that feels a bit more premium thanks to its stainless steel frame and slimmer body. It’s more expensive than the Bip 6, but at $100, it technically still makes the cutoff to land a spot on this list (barely).

For a more full-featured alternative to the Galaxy Fit 3, the older Galaxy Watch 4 still holds up to today’s standards with ECG and blood pressure tracking (but no skin temperature). It may not be as speedy as the newer models, but it will run the latest version of Wear OS and you can often find it for under $100 through third-party retailers like Walmart.

FAQs

What we look forward to in the second half of 2025

Smartwatches are only getting smarter about health, and I hope that continues; whether it’s better sensors, new metrics, or more personalized coaching, especially as more brands start leaning on AI to make sense of your data. One trend I’d love to see stick around in this year’s launches is better battery life. Smarter software and hardware upgrades like the dual CPU architecture on the OnePlus Watch 3 are finally making multiday wear feel realistic. Meanwhile, the definition of a wearable is expanding fast, with more smart rings making their debuts as well as upgraded earbud options with built-in health sensors that are already nudging into smartwatch territory. They probably won’t replace watches entirely, but they’re definitely raising the bar, and will continue giving the smartwatch category a healthy push forward.

Technologies

Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Saturday, June 21

Here are the answers for The New York Times Mini Crossword for June 21.

Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.


Today’s Mini Crossword was a tough one for me! I struggled with 7-Across and 3-Down especially. Need some help? Read on. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.

The Mini Crossword is just one of many games in the Times’ games collection. If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.

Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword

Let’s get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers.

Mini across clues and answers

1A clue:  Feeling extremely happy
Answer: JOYFUL

7A clue: Wake from sleep
Answer: AROUSE

8A clue: Brand of cinnamon-flavored chewing gum
Answer: BIGRED

9A clue: Talk and talk and talk
Answer: GAB

10A clue: Bengal, colt or dolphin
Answer: ANIMAL

13A clue: TV show ending
Answer: FINALE

14A clue: Rook, to a chess newbie
Answer: CASTLE

Mini down clues and answers

1D clue: Quick boxing punch
Answer: JAB

2D clue: Beginnings
Answer: ORIGINS

3D clue: Where you might strike a pose?
Answer: YOGAMAT

4D clue: Nickname for a fuzzy cat
Answer: FURBALL

5D clue: One of many for white vinegar
Answer: USE

6D clue: Was winning
Answer: LED

10D clue: The Bengals, Colts and Dolphins play in it: Abbr
Answer: AFC

11D clue: ___ DaCosta, director of 2023’s «The Marvels»
Answer: NIA

12D clue: Harper who wrote «To Kill a Mockingbird»
Answer: LEE

Continue Reading

Technologies

China and Developing Nations Trust AI the Most, UN Survey Finds

In the US and Europe, confidence in artificial intelligence is far lower.

Artificial intelligence may be a global technology, but public attitudes toward it are anything but universal. A new United Nations poll shows that trust in AI is highest in China and other developing economies, while richer nations remain deeply skeptical.

The findings come from a massive UN Development Programme survey that interviewed more than 21,000 people across 21 countries between November 2024 and January 2025. Researchers asked participants if they believe AI «serves the best interests of society,» and whether governments can harness the technology to improve daily life.

According to Bloomberg83% of participants in China said they trust AI, by far the highest share in the study,  Confidence levels were above 60% in Kyrgyzstan, Egypt, India, Nigeria and Pakistan, nations that do not belong to the UN’s very-high Human Development Index bracket, a yardstick for gauging overall well-being in a country.

The picture is the opposite in high-HDI economies. A minority of adults in the United States, Germany, Australia and Greece expressed faith that AI is being used for the common good. One notable exception is Japan, where 65% trust AI, despite the country’s high income and aging population.

The UN researchers don’t spell out why this gap exists, but other research hints at a pattern. In fast-growing economies, AI is widely promoted as a way to «skip steps» in development, perhaps filling in gaps in health care and classrooms, so the technology is viewed as a practical fix. In wealthier, more developed countries, headlines about disinformation and AI-driven job displacement dominate the conversation, leading to public unease.

Continue Reading

Technologies

iPhone 20 Rumors Point to All-Glass ‘Waterfall’ Screen and Anniversary-Inspired Name

Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman says Apple may skip «iPhone 19» altogether and deliver a 20th-anniversary handset whose display curves over all four edges, erasing traditional bezels.

If Apple really wants to make a splash for the iPhone’s 20th birthday in 2027, it may do more than just redesign the camera bump. 

Apple’s engineers are prototyping an iPhone internally nicknamed «Glass Wing,» according to Bloomberg reporter Mark Gurman, speaking on the Geared Up podcast this week, with a display that flows like a waterfall not only down the left and right sides, but also over the top and bottom of the phone. 

Gurman called it the «iPhone X design but on steroids,» and said that this is the phone that iOS 26 was designed for.

A foldable is expected to release at the end of 2026.

Gurman also floated the idea that Apple could brand the device the «iPhone 20,» sidestepping an «iPhone 19» to sync the model number with the anniversary year. A quad-curved, bezel-free screen would mark the iPhone’s most dramatic hardware overhaul since the iPhone X killed the Home button in 2017.

Reports out of South Korea’s ETNews say Apple is exploring «four-edge bending» OLED tech to make that borderless look possible, while Gurman’s Power On newsletter describes a «mostly glass, curved iPhone without any cutouts in the display,» hinting that the selfie camera and Face ID sensors could hide under the display. 

If Apple really does jump straight to an iPhone 20, the rename would echo this year’s jump from iOS 18 to iOS 26 and 2017’s leap from the iPhone 8 to the iPhone X, signaling just how big a redesign Apple thinks this phone will be.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version