Connect with us

Technologies

Motorola Razr 2025 vs. Razr Plus and Razr Ultra: All the Specs Compared

This year, Motorola added the $1,300 Ultra to its Razr lineup. Here’s how it stacks up against the two more affordable models.

Motorola has unveiled three new Razr foldable phones that range in price and features: the $700 Motorola Razr, the $1,000 Razr Plus and the $1,300 Razr Ultra, which are all available now. But what are the key differences between these modern flip phones?

The newest addition to the lineup, the Razr Ultra, levels up the capabilities you’ll find in the baseline Razr and the Razr Plus — and appears poised to give the $1,100 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 a run for its money. The Razr Ultra packs 50-megapixel wide and ultrawide cameras, a 4,700-mAh battery and 68-watt charging. But read on to see how it compares to its less pricey Razr counterparts and if nabbing the top-of-the-line device is worth the extra money. 

But first, here are some commonalities across the three phones. They all run Android 15, have a side fingerprint sensor, boast an IP48 rating for dust and water resistance and lack a headphone jack and expandable storage. 

Each phone is equipped with Moto AI features that can be activated with a dedicated button, or by looking and speaking directly at the phone. Motorola has integrated services from Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, Meta’s Llama and Google Gemini to handle tasks like transcriptions, brainstorming and serving up suggestions based on what’s on your screen.

One thing to note is how Motorola’s Android support comes up short compared to the competition. You’ll only get three years of major software upgrades and four years of security updates on the phones, compared to the seven years Samsung and Google offer on their phones.

Now, onto what separates the 2025 Motorola Razr, Razr Plus and Razr Ultra.

Razr 2025 vs. Razr Plus vs. Razr Ultra screen size(s)

The most noticeable difference when looking at the three phones is the nearly half-inch bezel on the baseline Razr’s cover screen, which shrinks down that display to 3.6 inches, versus the 4-inch cover displays on the Razr Plus and Razr Ultra. Another key difference is that the baseline Razr’s cover screen has a 90Hz variable refresh rate, while the two pricier phones go up to 165Hz. All three cover screens are pOLED displays.

Moving to the internal displays, the Razr has a 6.9-inch FHD+ AMOLED display with a 120Hz variable refresh rate, while the Razr Plus has a 6.9-inch FHD+ pOLED display with a 165Hz variable refresh rate. The Razr Ultra, meanwhile, has a 7-inch Super HD AMOLED display with a 165Hz variable refresh rate.

Razr 2025 vs. Razr Plus vs. Razr Ultra cameras

Camera capabilities could be a determining factor when choosing one of these three phones. The baseline Razr has a 50-megapixel wide and 13-megapixel ultrawide camera. The Razr Plus has a 50-megapixel wide and 50-megapixel telephoto camera. And the Razr Ultra packs a 50-megapixel wide and 50-megapixel ultrawide camera. 

Flipping to the internal screens, you’ll get a 32-megapixel selfie camera on the baseline Razr and the Razr Plus, and a 50-megapixel one on the Razr Ultra. Megapixels aren’t everything for camera and photo quality, but these specs definitely make the Ultra sound like a triple threat. Stay tuned for CNET’s reviews to see how these cameras perform in the real world.

Razr 2025 vs. Razr Plus vs. Razr Ultra batteries

Interestingly, the baseline Razr has a 4,500 mAh battery, higher than the 4,000 mAh you’ll get on the pricier Razr Plus. But the Razr Ultra tops them all with a 4,700 mAh battery. We’ll be sure to incorporate our battery test and observations into upcoming reviews of the phones to better understand how they perform day to day.

The Razr supports 30-watt wired charging and 15-watt wireless charging. Meanwhile, the Razr Plus supports 45-watt wired charging and 15-watt wireless charging, as well as 5-watt reverse charging, which can be handy if you have another device to charge and essentially want to turn your phone into a power bank. The Razr Ultra tops them all with 68-watt wired charging, 30-watt wireless charging and 5-watt reverse charging.

Razr 2025 vs. Razr Plus vs. Razr Ultra processor and storage

The baseline Razr is powered by a MediaTek Dimensity 7400X chipset, while the Razr Plus has a Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset and the Razr Ultra packs a Snapdragon 8 Elite processor. 

You’ll get 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage on the baseline Razr, 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage on the Razr Plus and 16GB of RAM with either 512GB or 1TB of storage on the Razr UItra. That can make the upcharge on the priciest Razr worth your money, if you’re inclined to use your phone for gaming or want to take loads of pictures without worrying about running out of storage space.

Should you upgrade from an older Razr?

On paper, there aren’t any huge differences between this year’s Razr and Razr Plus and last year’s models. The newer phones share the same screen sizes, pixel densities, general dimensions and camera specs as their predecessors. This year, Motorola added some features like dust resistance and new AI capabilities, but it’s probably not worth upgrading if you can hang onto your 2024 device a bit longer. 

If you have an older phone like the 2023 Razr and Razr Plus or earlier, you might be more enticed to upgrade to take advantage of faster charging, more powerful RAM and processors and, of course, new AI features. And especially with just three years of software updates, you might feel the clock ticking before it’s time for your next upgrade. 

Check out the spec chart below for a side-by-side breakdown and comparison of the three phones.

Motorola Razr (2025) vs. Razr Plus (2025) vs. Razr Ultra (2025)

Motorola Razr (2025) Motorola Razr Plus (2025) Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)
Cover display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate 3.6-inch pOLED; up to 90Hz variable refresh rate 4-inch pOLED; 1272 x 1080 pixels; up to 165Hz variable refresh rate 4-inch pOLED; up to 165Hz variable refresh rate
Internal display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate 6.9-inch AMOLED; FHD+; up to 120Hz variable refresh rate 6.9-inch pOLED; FHD+; 2640 x 1080 pixels; up to 165Hz variable refresh rate 7-inch AMOLED; super HD; up to 165Hz variable refresh rate
Pixel density Cover: 413 ppi; Internal: 413 ppi Cover: 417 ppi; Internal: 413 ppi Cover: 417 ppi; 464 ppi
Dimensions (inches) Open: 2.91 x 6.74 x 0.29 inches Closed: 2.91 x 3.47 x 0.62 inches Open: 2.91 x 6.75 x 0.28 inches Closed: 2.91 x 3.47 x 0.6 inches Open: 2.91 x 6.75 x 0.28 inches Closed: 2.91 x 3.47 x 0.62 inches
Dimensions (millimeters) Open: 73.99 x 171.30 x 7.25mm Closed: 73.99 x 88.08 x 15.85mm Open: 73.99 x 171.42 x 7.09mm Closed: 73.99 x 88.09 x 15.32mm Open: 73.99 x 171.48 x 7.19mm Closed: 73.99 x 88.12 x 15.69mm
Weight (grams, ounces) 188g (6.63 oz) 189g (6.67 oz) 199g (7 oz)
Mobile software Android 15 Android 15 Android 15
Cameras 50-megapixel (wide), 13-megapixel (ultrawide) 50-megapixel (wide), 50-megapixel telephoto 50-megapixel (wide), 50-megapixel (ultrawide)
Internal screen camera 32-megapixel 32-megapixel 50-megapixel
Video capture 4K 4K 4K
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7400X Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Snapdragon 8 Elite
RAM/storage 8GB + 256GB 12GB + 256GB 16GB + 512GB, 1TB
Expandable storage None None None
Battery 4,500 mAh 4,000 mAh 4,700m Ah
Fingerprint sensor Side Side Side
Connector USB-C USB-C USB-C
Headphone jack None None None
Special features IP48 rating, dual stereo speakers, 30-watt wired charging, 15-watt wireless charging, 1,700 nit peak brightness on cover display, 3,000 nit peak brightness on main display, 5G. IP48 rating, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus on front, titanium-reinforced hinge, 2,400 peak brightness on cover display; 3,000 nit peak brightness on main display, 5G, Wi-Fi 6/6E, Wi-Fi 7, 45-watt wired charging, 15-watt wireless charging, 5-watt reverse charging. IP48 rating, 68-watt wired charging, 30-watt wireless charging, 5-watt reverse charging, dual stereo speakers, Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic cover dispaly, 3,000 nits peak brightness on cover display, 4,500 nits peak brightness on main display, 5G.
US price starts at $700 $1,000 $1,300

Technologies

Amazon’s Delivery Drivers Will Soon Wear AI Smart Glasses to Work

The goal is to streamline the delivery process while keeping drivers safe.

Amazon announced on Wednesday that it is developing new AI-powered smart glasses to simplify the delivery experience for its drivers. CNET smart glasses expert Scott Stein mentioned this wearable rollout last month, and now the plan is in its final testing stages.

The goal is to simplify package delivery by reducing the need for drivers to look at their phones, the label on the package they’re delivering and their surroundings to find the correct address. 


Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.


A heads-up display will activate as soon as the driver parks, pointing out potential hazards and tasks that must be completed. From there, drivers can locate and scan packages, follow turn-by-turn directions and snap a photograph to prove delivery completion without needing to take out their phone.

The company is testing the glasses in select North American markets.

Watch: See our Instagram post with a video showing the glasses

A representative for Amazon didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

To fight battery drain, the glasses pair with a controller attached to the employee’s delivery vest, allowing them to replace depleted batteries and access operational controls. The glasses will support an employee’s eyeglass prescription. An emergency button will be within reach to ensure the driver’s safety. 

Amazon is already planning future versions of the glasses, which will feature «real-time defect detection,» notifying the driver if a package was delivered to the incorrect address. They plan to add features to the glasses to detect if pets are in the yard and adjust to low light.

Continue Reading

Technologies

First Partner to the Stars: Muon Space Adopts Starlink Lasers for Millisecond Data Transfer

By integrating Starlink’s mini laser technology, Muon Space will eliminate ground station bottlenecks to build a high-speed, real-time network in orbit.

Satellites firing lasers at each other in space sounds like science fiction, but it’s happening right now, as terabytes of data quickly pass across the Starlink network. Muon Space satellites are set to adopt the technology, enabling a near future when they transfer data as easily as we access the internet on the ground.

This week, Muon announced it will incorporate Starlink’s mini laser technology into its upcoming Halo spacecraft, with the first outfitted satellite going up in 2027. Starlink satellites communicate with each other using lasers, creating a mesh network in low-Earth orbit, or LEO. The tech supports 25Gbps connections between satellites at a range of up to 4,000 kilometers. Higher data speeds are available at shorter distances.

Muon Space will be the first company outside of Starlink parent SpaceX to use the mini laser technology on its satellites.


Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.


Satellites typically suffer from bottlenecks like latency when communicating with ground stations, and lag when traveling between them. 

«Most of the Earth observation and analytics in space have been constrained at a systems level by this little straw of connectivity, which gets pinched most of the time and only gets connected once in a while,» Muon Space’s president, Gregory Smirin, told CNET.

With the mini laser technology, Muon satellites will join the Starlink network for real-time data access and high-bandwidth streaming. Muon says latency gets reduced to milliseconds. It also noted that data is end-to-end encrypted to maintain the security of customer information.

Normally, this kind of announcement is intended to excite Muon’s existing and potential corporate customers, but the broader implications of the technology will also be felt by everyday people. Smirin equated the adoption of the mini laser technology on satellites to the shift from the days when people connected to the internet using dial-up modems to the always-on access that’s prevalent today.

«Even in 2027, you’re going to start to see the impact of this kind of persistent connectivity on services that will be visible to individuals,» Smirin said. «Space is becoming a ground truth enabler.»

For example, Muon Space is the hardware supplier behind FireSat, the system of satellites developed in conjunction with Google and the Earth Fire Alliance to locate and track wildfires from space. In July, the companies released the first FireSat images from an initial protoflight satellite in orbit for testing.

Smirin explained that reducing latency will help operators track a fire’s direction and progress. He cited this year’s wildfires in Los Angeles, when the winds and smoke prevented aircraft from flying overhead to make accurate observations. With FireSat, you could get that information on an ongoing basis, enabling responders to better establish perimeters for personnel and equipment.

«We’re providing five to ten times the capacity that the rest of the new space industry is providing, so this is a massive step forward,» he said. 

Smirin said the company is confident in the technology. After all, these are the same terminals Starlink uses to operate its global mesh network. «It’s operating today for everyone, and it’s reliable, and now it’s about bringing that capacity to organizations outside of Starlink.»

Continue Reading

Technologies

Kohler Wants to Put a Tiny Camera in Your Toilet and Analyze the Contents

The company’s new Dekoda toilet accessory is like a little bathroom detective.

Some smart litter boxes can monitor our pets’ habits and health, so having a camera in our human toilet bowls seems inevitable. That’s just what kitchen and bathroom fixture company Kohler has done for its new health and wellness brand, Kohler Health

The $599 Dekoda clamps over the rim like a toilet bowl cleaner, pointing an optical sensor at your excretions and secretions. It then analyzes the images to detect any blood and reviews your gut health and hydration status. Depending on the plan you choose, the subscription fee is between $70 and $156 per year.


Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.


At toilet time, you sign in via a fingerprint sensor so that the device knows who’s using the facilities. (Please wash your hands before signing out or tracking your progress.) Then, check in with the app for the day’s analysis and trends over time. 

Wait until you’re off the pot, though, before you start doomscrolling your health. The device has a removable, rechargeable battery and uses a USB connection. 

Kohler says it secures your data via the aforementioned fingerprint scanner and end-to-end encryption, and notes that the camera uses «discreet optics,» looking only at the results, not your body parts. 

«Dekoda’s sensors see down into your toilet and nowhere else,» the company says. 

Kohler warns that the technology doesn’t work very well with dark toilet colors, which makes sense. I’m sure there could be an upsell model with a light on it. Maybe the company could add an olfactory sensor, since smell reveals a lot about your gut health too. It could track «session» length or buildup under the rim to alert whoever has responsibility to clean it.

Kohler must have been straining to find appropriate lifestyle photos to include with the publicity materials. Many of the images are hilarious, featuring fit-looking men and women drinking water and staring off into space contemplatively — probably thinking about gas.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version